Unruled Notebook

Entries from November 2007

Nigersaurus, the Open Access Dinosaur

November 16, 2007 · 3 Comments

ResearchBlogging.org“Daddy! Lets play animal name telling”, beckoned my four year old. “Alright kiddo”, I complied and began. Cat. Now, you tell an animal name dear. STEGOSAURUS. Now you pa. Well, Dog. Your turn. PLESIOSAUR. What about you? Hmm, Rabbit. IGUANODON. Horse. TYRANNOSAURUS. Elephant. PTERANODON (pronounced by the kid as pTEranODDOn). That did me. Wait a minute dear. I am sure you dunno what a Pteranodon means… I know, pa. Its a bird. A big one with very big beaks, unlike an eagle. Has bones in its feathers. Lived in old times. Now dead. Unrelenting, I plod, “Well, then what about this Plessi…Pleiso…what is that?” Plesiosaur lives in water Daddy. It eats all fish. Even sharks. But is dead now. Then she hit me unassumingly. What about you dad; don’t you know any dinosaur name to tell? Haven’t you read books?

Bora saved me the blushes with his email. I know an extreme dinosaur that my kid don’t. Yet.

Nigersaurus.

In a recent open access PLoS paper, titled Structural Extremes in a Cretaceous Dinosaur and authored by Sereno PC, Wilson JA, Witmer LM, Whitlock JA, Maga A, et al., Paul Sereno decided to publish his description of Nigersaurus, the bizzare Mesozoic relative of Diplodocus. If you are into such stuff, skip this post and read the paper from PLoS directly. Else, read it after reading this post.

Well, Bora made me read Paul’s “biology” paper and I dared. When encountering the alternate use of “familiar” words like radiation or radiating (as in “…to have radiated across both Gondwana and Laurasia during the Cretaceous…”), I needed sometime to take my head out of electromagnetic radiation, heat transfer, Boltzmann, etc. That and some relative jargons hampered my pace.

But reading the paper by Paul Cereno et al. failed to preserve my ignorance about Nigersaurus. Anway, I was driven by my kid.

Apart from unearthing the fossils of many specimens, Paul’s team have also reconstructed the Nigersaurus using digital computed tomography (software: 3D Studio Max, Zbrush, and Mimics). Click on the accompanied image for a high resolution version.

It compares with man like this

journalpone0001230g003.png

Both pictures are courtesy Paul Sereno and his Open Access PLoS paper.

As to why Nigersaurus is exciting for some of us (I admitted earlier, I was only driven by the desire to one-up my four year old kid), Bora explains

A French paleontologist, Dr. Philippe Taquet, who led the first fossil expeditions to Niger in the 1960s., brought home some bone fragments that he never named. It took three decades until more of this dinosaur was found. In 1997., a member of Paul Sereno’s team discovered the skull of a bizzare-looking dinosaurus which they named Nigersaurus taqueti in honor of their French predecessor. In 1999., Sereno brought in a crew that dug out an almost complete skeleton of this animal, a younger, smaller cousin of the Diplodocus, one of my favourite dinos since I was a little kid.

Further, as I gather from Paul and his team’s paper and Bora’s post, over the years there exist contention whether Diplodocoids were creatures that ate only from the trees – long neck with head position looking up like giraffe – or whether they included ground level plants as food because of their head position looking earthwards. Nigersaurus, with their reconstructed anatomy of a comparatively short neck and earthward looking face, suggests there should have been, “low-browsing feeding strategy among diplodocoids.” The relevant conclusion from the paper reads

Modest body length, a proportionately short neck, and downward deflection of the muzzle in Nigersaurus are conditions that characterize many diplodocoids and now represent an alternative basal condition for the clade. Nigersaurus is the culmination of a low-browsing feeding strategy among diplodocoids that originated in the mid Jurassic and may have had an ecologically significant impact on surface vegetation on several land areas during the Cretaceous.

Reading the paper further I could gather Nigersaurus seems to have possessed a functional skull made of minimal structural material. A case of so much head and so little inside. This anatomical discovery raises intrigue about – to loosely put it – the minimal critical mass for a functional skull. Also, to my fascination, based on the anatomy of the Nigersaurus, Peter ans his team speculate even on the type and extent of vegetation of the Cretacious land [gallery of possible plants]. Vegetation that should have been dino-food for this short-necked, airy skulled, tooth-to-tooth chewing cycled, herbivore Nigersaurus.

More fascinating glimpses of a Cretaceous journey awaits us at PLoS or at the Extreme Dinosaur website – courtesy Peter Serano’s timely decision to take Nigersaurus Open Access.

Reference:

Sereno, P., Wilson, J., Witmer, L., Whitlock, J., Maga, A., Ide, O., & Rowe, T. (2007). Structural Extremes in a Cretaceous Dinosaur PLoS ONE, 2 (11) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001230

Categories: Information · Science Notes
Tagged: , ,

Protocol for Permeability Measurement

November 15, 2007 · 3 Comments

ResearchBlogging.orgA porous medium comprising of at least a stationary solid matrix and a fluid flowing through it is characterized usually by three properties. The first one, the volumetric porosity, is intuitive and is the ratio of the void (fluid) volume to the total (solid + fluid) volume of the porous medium. Permeability K (m2) and Form coefficient C (m-1) are the two other hydraulic properties necessary to characterize the flow of a fluid through a porous medium. As viscosity and density are properties of a fluid, so are K and C of a porous medium. Earlier discussion on flow through porous media and permeametry are refreshers before we proceed to explain a research paper today.

Experiments determining K and C are usually influenced by undesired secondary effects. This results in higher uncertainties in their determination.

This note describes the suggestions we made in a recent Physics of Fluids paper [Ref. 1 given at the end] on how to avoid such secondary effects. We restrict the discussion only to the determination of permeability although the paper also discusses form coefficient measurement.
(more…)

Categories: Porous Medium · Research Notes
Tagged: , , , , ,

Stick to Cricket, Peter Roebuck

November 4, 2007 · 5 Comments

Peter Roebuck, one of my favorite cricket columnists unfortunately has begun to assume more expertise than he qualifies. Result, he has begun to babble.

Talking out of depth happens when experts of one field (say, cricket) either by self or externally spawned delusion assume expertise in other fields (say, world politics).

In yesterday’s column in Hindu, Peter writes

[...] Cliche casts India as bustling and chaotic, Pakistan as feudal. Yet both nations are booming. The Pakistan economy and stock market are growing at a rate matched only by its neighbour.

According to William Dalrymple, sales of mobile phones in Pakistan have risen from three million to 50 million in four years. It is an unstoppable force. Independent newspapers are setting up in the main cities, and the middle class is rising. In short, Pakistan is finding its feet.

Well, today, emergency is imposed in Pakistan by its military ruler, gagging the media.

Peter continues on India

Nor has India any longer any reason to doff its hat to anyone. Not so long ago the country was cast as a haven of disease, poverty and dust. Or else it was patronised as spiritual and quaint. Now it is regarded as a formidable force and respected as an embodiment of the secularism others can only crave.

Casting the subcontinent as “a haven of disease, poverty and dust” or “as spiritual and quaint” or as “an embodiment of the secularism others can only crave”, is done mostly by white non-Indian writers. These myopic generalizations are convenient cliches for unimaginative column writers who fluff instead of stuff on a chosen issue.

Subcontinent readers like me want to read Peter for the “outsider” view – often unbiased and untainted by the local emotions. Such readers don’t want Peter doing his “subcontinental mind-reading” so that he (too) can “reflect the pulse of the nation”. We have many local writers who fulfill that task of cricket as a larger than sport activity for the subcontinent. It is they who promote “cricket as a bilateral political agenda to improve relations” between these perpetually developing nations. I think incisive Peter has more useful things to say when he writes only Cricket.

For instance, even in the concerned article, he correctly captures what the sport of cricket does to us

[...]Once Younis Khan or Virender Sehwag start batting the absurdity is revealed. As Younis begins to play his cultured strokes or Sehwag cuts loose in that madcap way the heart starts to race.[...]

But he chooses to meander with the rest of the article. He wants to reflect the pulse of the subcontinental public by invoking a “larger than cricket is at stake” imagery. This travesty is evident when he writes

Once derided, the rupee is eagerly sought. Everyone goes to India, including the most craven opportunists. In short, this series will be played between two important nations.

Minority government ruled India and emergency imposed Pakistan are two “important nations” in what? The only explicit answer could perhaps be “Cricket” but the implicit one that Peter’s pretentious article proposes is “in World Politics”.

That statement by Peter would reflect reality only when the USA and China choose to play cricket against each other.

Categories: Muse
Tagged: , ,